Opened 15 years ago

Closed 13 years ago

#63 closed defect (fixed)

zwriting multiple users looks like zwriting one user

Reported by: xavid@MIT.EDU Owned by: adehnert@MIT.EDU
Priority: minor Milestone:
Component: ui Keywords:
Cc: xavid@mit.edu

Description

doing 

zwrite foo bar

results in an entry like 

   Zephyr sent to foo  13:38  (zsig)
       Body

which looks like it only actually got sent to the first recipient, though it does correctly go to all listed recipients.

Change History (4)

comment:1 Changed 15 years ago by adehnert@MIT.EDU

We have at least two ways to display "zwrite foo bar"

Option A:

Zephyr sent to foo 13:38 (zsig)

Body

Zephyr sent to bar 13:38 (zsig)

Body

This leaves us with a further choice: what happens if you reply to one of them?

# Replies to just the user under the cursor # Replies to both users

(1) seems more intuitive...

Option B:

Zephyr sent to foo bar 13:38 (zsig)

Body

There are at least two ways to implement this:

# Put all recipients in the recipient field, probably separated by spaces # Put all recipients in a new recipients field, as a list or space-separated

(1) would probably be easier to do in the short term, but might cause bugs; (2) is probably more invasive but less bug-filled.

Thoughts?

comment:2 Changed 15 years ago by adehnert@MIT.EDU

  • Owner changed from nelhage@mit.edu to adehnert@MIT.EDU

(And this is why you should preview...)

We have at least two ways to display "zwrite foo bar"

Option A: 

    Zephyr sent to foo 13:38 (zsig)
        Body
    Zephyr sent to bar 13:38 (zsig)
        Body

This leaves us with a further choice: what happens if you reply to one of them?

  1. Replies to just the user under the cursor
  2. Replies to both users

(1) seems more intuitive...

Option B: 

    Zephyr sent to foo bar 13:38 (zsig)
        Body

There are at least two ways to implement this:

  1. Put all recipients in the recipient field, probably separated by spaces
  2. Put all recipients in a new recipients field, as a list or space-separated

(1) would probably be easier to do in the short term, but might cause bugs; (2) is probably more invasive but less bug-filled.

Thoughts?

comment:3 Changed 15 years ago by adehnert@MIT.EDU

Consensus via Zephyr seems to be Option A.1 (multiple zephyrs, replying goes just to the user under the cursor).

Further, CC'd messages should give "CC'd" as the pretty_recipient (consensus on this versus "multiple recipients" is a bit weaker). (Note that the information given by "i" on the message will be (arguably?) wrong (it will still display only one recipient), but I think that is okay.)

comment:4 Changed 13 years ago by andersk@mit.edu

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from new to closed

Fixed in commit e5da3fe3addbd16cf3a528bb6ac04d487f746afc and commit a5b5d008191f55eef1eb0b5bec5ad029c65bf367.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.